
Roller Coaster – Artist Unknown
Roller Coaster, is the header illustration on a flyer promoting one-act plays by a group of area writers and actors. An actor friend gave it to me some weeks ago (the event has come and gone by now). Beyond the one-act plays themselves, I was taken by the simplicity, and power of the illustration. Credit was not given the artist, and I suspect the illustration is from a public domain, cut -and-paste publication.
Why reproduce it here? Well, because it seems to me an excellent example of translation over transcription. I have a hunch the artist may have just “knocked” this out, almost without thinking. It might have been only one of many works he produced in a relatively short time. He, or she, might even have considered it a “throw away!” Still, it is – in my view – masterfully done. Kudos and congratulations to the unknown artist! The simplicity is addictive!
I realize some readers won’t “get it.” I doubt most people would “get it.” (I use the word “would” instead of “will” purposely.) I even doubt many actors for whom the piece was created – artists themselves – noticed or appreciated the artistic uniqueness of the illustration. They are probably not alone in missing the obvious. And, that is exactly why I post it here. Enjoy, or shake your head in disbelief; the choice is yours.

#1 by David Peterson on June 18th, 2007
Quote
Actually I did this one. That’s me in the middle, I am on the roller coaster and I can’t get off.
David
#2 by Woody on June 18th, 2007
Quote
It figures …
(Play guitar intro, up and down for background music)
#3 by Russell Black on June 19th, 2007
Quote
This image comes from the PrintMaster series of software, art disk #3 on my particular version. There are many fine examples of “clip” art that come stock with this program, some just as nice (or artistically simple) as this one, some even better.
I remember when print shops used to hire freelancers to create these types of logos. Not bad work actually. It was a great way to cut your teeth in the print business. Now, geeks with computers do the work it used to take skilled craftsmen (and women) to do.
When discussing a similar matter with Woody, here is a good example of why artists seem to be lacking in the upcoming generation. They are not needed. Simply point and click on some computer stockpiled art, and who needs a skilled professional?
Something to think about when you go get those business cards printed with a logo that isn’t designed by a human, other than to point and click a mouse.
Maybe if we all demanded better work, there might be a reason to birth some new talent. Or are we willing to let a Mac or PC program be the design masters from now on?
#4 by Chico Chick on June 22nd, 2007
Quote
I’m confused.
The art comes from a program filled with a variety of images–images presumably made by the same level of person/people cutting teeth way-back-when in a world that is now CAD driven. (If you welcome the internet, you’ve got to welcome CAD. Because some people abuse/misuse a thing does not make the thing evil.)
Instead of the artist being hired one time for one image (at a price almost no one is worth to make it affordable for the consumer), the artist(s) get paid a flat fee and/or royalties.
Given these programs, now anyone can click on an image here and a font there and create something aesthetically pleasing?
I hardly think so.
There is just as much demand for artists today as there has ever been, or did I miss something about Vincent Van Gogh? Or Oscar Wilde? Or Paul Gauguin? Or Mary Wells? Or. . .
Really, this list could go on and on.
#5 by The Art Critic on June 22nd, 2007
Quote
Umm… I see the reductive quality of the facture spatially, yet it does not seem to undermine the exploration of montage elements.